Resistance is futile. You will comply

Email · Print
 
Admiring advertising for its creativity is a bit like admiring Nazism for its cool uniforms. It's all too easy - and strangely comforting - to believe that it's truly as attractive as it initially seems. But then reality kicks in, and guiltily, you realise you've just been tempted by the sugar-coated gateway to Hell.

NSEP

The advertising industry is a soulless vortex that sucks up all the creativity it can find into its gluttonous maw, then spews forth a bilious froth of contempt into the willing mouths of kneeling consumers. And since big business now has more power over our beliefs, attitudes and values than any government ever could, you may as well go ahead and think of advertising as nothing more than propaganda, which has been designed to purely to re-program your brain to do what your real leaders tell you. Because essentially, that's exactly what it is.

Now that we live in more cynical times, advertisers know that we're onto them, so they have to constantly come up with new tricks to divert our attention from the fact that they're trying to sell us crap we don’t really need. The half-page advert by the "National Skirt Extension Project" in the latest Sunday Times is an entertaining example.

"Attention all South Africans," proclaims the ad. "After extensive consultation it has been determined that the current skirt length on the majority of ladies restroom signs is inadequate. As such, a new figure, bearing a longer skirt, has been recommended for use nationwide."

Tapping into the spirit of the Borg, the ad goes on to say: "Compliance is mandatory...all owners of public restroom facilities will be required to install new, approved ladies signage as a matter of urgency."

Wow. This could only work in a country like South Africa, where people are still easily intimidated by an authoritative voice and take themselves way too seriously for their own good.

The advert is backed up by a website, an 0860 line (meaning you pay to call them) and apparently some radio ads, too. So we’re talking megabucks here – at least a few hundred grand for something that looks like a belated April Fool’s joke.

My first thought in seeing the ad was, "Damn! Wouldn’t it be awesome if this was actually real?" Imagine all the fun we could have taking the piss out of these freaks. At the very least it would be an interesting diversion from all that depressing Zuma news that makes me want to hide under my bed with a shotgun aimed at the front door. Or wait - was diversion their intention all along? Hmm...

But according to the Cape Times, the ad was apparently placed on behalf of multinational biggies Unilever, who provide us with Slimfast shakes, Dove soap and Axe deodorant, among many other familiar products. Yes, these are the people who used advertising to convince a generation of middle class, hormone-ravaged boys that if they sprayed enormous amounts of cheap-ass deodorant all over their awkward bodies they’d never have to make love to their pillow ever again.

So what could have been anything will turn out to be just another stupid ad. How disappointing. And just for building me up, then bringing me down, I promise not to buy whatever they're selling. 

 
Get published on Channel24!

Send us your movie, music and live gig reviews and columns and get published on Channel24. Send your articles to » PublishMe@sa.24.com

 

Add your comment

(Comments may be edited or deleted at the Channel24 editors’ discretion)
Peter 8/20/2009 10:40 AM
Good read... I'm with Ryan on this one.
Thomas 4/16/2009 7:47 AM
Sounds like a bad copy of a campaign by the Crispin Porter + Bogusky agency in the US. They've done similar stuff for MINI, and MAXIM in the states.. Check out this : protestit.co.za - a ridiculous idea to re-build table mountain
Mo 4/14/2009 12:58 AM
Anyone ever play any of the GTA games... Its like sumthin outa GTA.... Hehehehe.. hw ranDom.. o_O
Warren 4/13/2009 7:29 PM
Claire are you the "0"
robert 4/13/2009 6:53 PM
somone said it was an add 4 g-strings!! HAHAHA thatz quite funny! wait... is it?? oh and please reply 2 this when you do the security text thing at the end of your comment... whats the point? how does it work, plz comment on how it works THANKS!
Lynne Szlovak 4/13/2009 5:45 PM
What a load of old cobblers!Wonder whether Mike Sutcliffe of Durban Metro Council's behind it, since he saw fit to change Durban's street names to those of folk who are largely unpronouncable let alone unknown. Oh! Whatever happened to leaders with more to do with their time...
Shaz 4/13/2009 4:06 PM
Omg ppz..seriously?! hw culd any1 beleive dat in da 1st place..its da stupidest thng eva. It wuld hav been a waste of money nd do u rli tnk ppl wuld do dat..nd anyway, wat difference duz it make
CulPRit 4/13/2009 11:56 AM
I can not believe most of the comments here! It is obvious that you do not even have a clue as to what is really going on. Even after you are told it is only an add campaign, you still think they are serious about changing the signs on the ladies' loo. Not so. So please relax. Thats not the campaign. If you fell for it, be cross with yourself - very cross - for beeing so naive as to believe all this cr@p just because "its in the media".
robert 4/13/2009 11:19 AM
this is pathetic, i mean REALLY!Like that O person said earlier, they should put all the signs on 1 door, but then the will be some doors with only one of them so in the end it will turn out to apartheid days when 'this bathroom can be used if you have nice legs'or 'reserved for those that have floating heads, a nun dress and are bald'
Henry 4/13/2009 10:24 AM
Just stop buyi8ng Unilever products!
David 4/13/2009 9:14 AM
As Winston Churchill said ; Advertsing - the shaking of a stick in a swill bucket.
Jo 4/9/2009 3:38 PM
"O" I think you're brilliant! Luv your sense of humour! "O" for president! JZ, you've got no chance my friend!
vusi 4/9/2009 3:14 PM
No it's an ad for g-strings. that's why you need the longer skirt...
Freedomfighter 4/9/2009 3:01 PM
What a load of crap. We're being forced back into the stone age. South Africa is the the new "Little China".
Nick 4/9/2009 2:57 PM
Brilliant campaign. Has done exactly what it intended to do, made everyone think and talk.
ps 4/9/2009 2:30 PM
Sure it caught my attention but so does a road accident, dead animals on a highway and deformed people. Advertising sucks and doesn't even do that very well.
Catherine 4/9/2009 1:43 PM
It's so pathetic. There are more important things to worry about.
Audi 4/9/2009 1:05 PM
Paid for for Unilever.....let me guess - ermmm.....AXE deodorant
Truddy 4/9/2009 12:46 PM
Whoever came with this idea, should be shipped to Zimbamwe
O 4/9/2009 12:42 PM
By the way, it's an advert, a stupid one yes...BUT it caught my attention in total. So, it worked exactly as it was intended. Well done guys...but just for the record...What are they advertising? Who made the add? I guess it's some lady with knock knees or swollen ankles. Did they take into consideration the women that have sexy legs? It's not their fault that they were born with good looking legs. Maybe they should make a sign for every situation there is and cover the entire ladies loo door with all the types. then there is no discrimination and all ladies may go to that loo. Everyones happy! Except the owner of the door. He has to buy all the signs, which is what the sign maker wants. Hence the add. It's all coming together now. I'm a genius, I should run for president!
Simon 4/9/2009 12:37 PM
This would work in the states!
O 4/9/2009 12:24 PM
You never know. This entire artical proves that there is some crazy wierd stuff in this world, so I thought there is a chance. Maybe the person that designed the sign is the 0.00001%
@O 4/9/2009 12:11 PM
why not 100%?, or are you suggesting that there is a one legged nun with no neck lurking in some monastery? :-)
Pete 4/9/2009 12:07 PM
What's she got in the bag with the 'tick' on it ... easter eggs! Merry Easter all, be safe and not to serious ;-)
O 4/9/2009 12:02 PM
The more I look at this sign, the more I think it's discriminating. Where are 99.9999% of the women suppossed to go to the loo now? Only one legged women with no neck, very very short hair in nun outfits are allowed to go to this loo. This is such an awesome way to waste time at work! sigh, yawn... At least it distracts us for a bit away from our criminal president-to-be and the circus he conducts.
theDriver 4/9/2009 11:59 AM
advertisers want to capture your attention first before luring you into buying something that you dont need. If you are an id!ot, you will do it & if you are level headed you wont. There is nothing wrong with this ad, there are many more stupid ads campaigns going around, but then we are South African and complain about anything & everything, even if it's unneccessary. Surely it's much easier to ignore an ad rather than burst your nerves complaining about it??, but that's just me...
Unreal 4/9/2009 11:55 AM
Pathetic article, and mostly pathetic resonses. It's a teaser campaign and boy has it got everyone talking! Success! Well done to the creative team on this one.
D 4/9/2009 11:44 AM
Don't be so serious, after all what did it cost you? Do you know how many people are gullible and will believe it! LOL
Pike 4/9/2009 11:41 AM
Regardless of what this is advertising, I think it's brilliant ... in an era and country where woman are attacked in the streets for wearing trousers, a de facto criminal runs for president and a healthy man is released from jail on medical parole, maybe we need something as ridiculous as this campaign to catch a bit of a wake up, or to at least smile for a while ;-) for another laugh, check this out http://www.thetimes.co.za/News/Article.aspx?id=977660
Ian 4/9/2009 11:37 AM
It's an advertising campaign - Get over it
Lejane 4/9/2009 11:34 AM
What was the point though? But anyway....
Michele 4/9/2009 11:25 AM
Silly, think about it. JZ coming into power. Might distract him these signs of girls with short skirts. Clever Unilever.
will 4/9/2009 11:22 AM
People should focus their time on important things rather than waisting it on stupid campains...they need to get a life!!!!!!!!1
Diane 4/9/2009 11:09 AM
I thought that a skirt indicated which is the ladies loo. Why all the hype whether the skirt is long or short. For whose benefit is it anyway. Hell man we just need to know which is the gents or ladies loo.
Rosemary 4/9/2009 10:54 AM
Stupid, if it's Unilevel I will not buy their products again.
Yolandi 4/9/2009 10:29 AM
this a absolute stupidity. They should be more concerned about that terrible Lollippo Ad on the billboards. How do we answer our kids when they ask about that naked woman on the Billboard. THAT CAN GO FOR SURE. It's just embarrasinG.
Jasmin 4/9/2009 9:52 AM
I think this is discriminating to young women everywhere. The new dame on the sign is clearly wearing an "old-woman" dress, implying the facilities are for old women only and hence young ladies now have nowhere to go do there business.
O 4/9/2009 9:45 AM
I looked at the picture before reading anything and the first thing I thought is that we are about to read an article about equal rights for women and how they should start wearing longer skirts or pants to be taken more seriously in the work place, other than showing skin and getting things the 'old' way. sex sells! but then i had to read through this junk! If this is real, who started the add? the company that makes bathroom door signs? Let's make a new law and we get to sell another billion signs and get rich off the stupidity of the public. Surely this is an April Fools!
Werner 4/9/2009 9:30 AM
Of course it is advertising. The point you all are missing is that the goal of advertising is to attract people to your brand (and sometimes by all means). This project was hoping that journalists such as this one would do an article on the "stupidity" of the project and the fact that advertising is stepping over the line etc. This way Rantboy, Casius, Ytah and Ryan would start thinking about whatever this project might mean (whether their thoughts are negative or positive it doesn't matter) and form an opinion for themselves. If you really hate an advertising campaign, just don't talk about it...but you can't do that...it's much more interesting than your everyday life. We all have a job, and Chris, yours is to make us read your articles, by ANY means...even if it is using the same tactics you are dishing here.
Ryan 4/8/2009 6:20 PM
A great read. Casius obviously more interested in this months FHM.. Reminds me to listen to Bill Hicks again..
YTAH 4/8/2009 4:39 PM
@Casius: And the morons keep reading, then complaining about reading. Congratulations.
Casius 4/8/2009 3:51 PM
Yawn... boring (*as usual)
rantboy 4/8/2009 12:01 PM
Yeah, I saw street sign posters for this today. Will not dignify their website with my traffic...
Your Name
Email
Comment
Please enter the text below
Captcha