Marguerite Wheatley interview

Email · Print
 
The former Egoli star talks about her big Hollywood break and getting up close and intimate with Matt Damon in Invictus.

Marguerite Wheatley interview

Q. How did you find out about Invictus and get cast opposite Matt Damon as Francois Pienaar's wife Nerine?

I come from such a conservative background that I didn’t even think I'd become an actor, never mind that I would get a part in a movie like this. I went for the audition and put it behind me, because when you go for auditions, the best thing to do is forget about it. But you have to remember that if you can dream it, you can get it. It's exhilarating to know I got here with hard work and dedication.

Q. What was your first day on set like?

I had extreme tummy ache, I didn’t get any sleep the night before at all. Not because I was nervous, I just knew that this was it and that I had to make an impression. I kept telling myself, "Just remember your lines. Just remember your lines" and I didn’t even have that many lines. Normally I don’t stress about lines. I've worked on soaps and that’s like a wors-masjien where you have to get all the lines in at once. This was different, it was a few lines but with so much subtext that you have to get the emotions of the character right. When I arrived on set, I had never met anyone. I met Matt that first day. He came over to me and said, "Hi, I'm Matt. I'm playing your husband." And I just went, "Argh, I can't believe I have to do this right now, I'm not ready! Can we please have some coffee and chat?" Clint also came over and [puts on Dirty Harry impression] "Hi, I'm Clint and you're just going to sit right there." I was devastated! Everyone was so welcoming and warm, there was nothing to worry about.

Q. What is Clint Eastwood like as a director?

He's very free. I've never worked with a director like this before. He uses realism to the max and likes to use real people, not necessarily actors. He basically puts the camera in place and tells you "Go". He doesn't even say "action" or go off set. Usually after they've set up a scene, the director will disappear behind a monitor. He was right there all the time, watching. It's almost like a rehearsal. He only does one or two takes and keeps it very natural.

Q. What was your offscreen relationship with Matt Damon like?

Look, I was quite shy. People kept telling me to ride the wave and keep in contact with everyone over e-mail, but I'm just couldn't. I'm not that type of person. So we chatted when we had time on set and he had a few questions about the language and I helped with certain words when his dialogue coach wasn't within reach. We'd chat about the culture and he had a lot of questions about rugby. I didn’t want to invade anyone's space so when I was done for the day I would get out of the way. But I wanted to absorb as much as I could so sometimes I'd stay on set, hide out in a corner somewhere, to watch everyone work.

Q. It must've been nerve-wrangling to shoot your romantic scene with him.

That scene actually happened on the second day of shooting, so you can imagine [giggles]. The first day I already had a tsunami in my stomach, and the next day I had to kiss Matt Damon. Since Clint Eastwood doesn’t give much direction, I wasn’t sure when the scene was starting so I just decided to gooi. That's what drama school teaches you, to just improvise if you've forgotten your lines. So I just went along with it and it worked. I didn't know what I was doing, but I just did it.

Q. Do you remember where you were during the 1995 Rugby World Cup final match?

I remember very vividly. It was in Yzerfontein, a very small town, and it exploded into this massive mess of people hugging and kissing and running down the streets. It was like I was on a complete high. I was 13 years old at the time and I remember having to sit on the carpet during the game, because "groot mense sit op die bank, kinders op die grond" (grown ups sit on the chairs, children on the floor). I was too young to understand at the time what this game would mean to our country. To me it was just a huge rugby game.

Q. Now that you've starred in a huge Hollywood movie, what's next for you?

I think one should never assume that once you've been in a huge movie that you're always going to have work. In South Africa we have good projects, we have mediocre projects and what we like to call "low budget". But I just want to work. I'm happy with my work so far and I think that as an actor you need to keep working on your craft.

* Invictus is currently on circuit across South Africa.
Watch our video interview with Morgan Freeman and the stars arrive at the Invictus premiere in Cape Town.

 
 
Get published on Channel24!

Send us your movie, music and live gig reviews and columns and get published on Channel24. Send your articles to » PublishMe@sa.24.com

 

Add your comment

(Comments may be edited or deleted at the Channel24 editors’ discretion)
Joe Joe @ Mckyle Seneca 12/20/2009 10:19 AM
Nelson Mandela was released from prison on 11 February 1990. The comment by 'mourning democracy' about the link between the fall of the USSR and the changing of the ANC stance is true and well documented. If you look at major shifts in African politics you can clearly see the 1960's indepedence on the back of bankrupt colonies and the Western countries own economic problems, followed by 30 years of one party rule/dictatorships and proxy cold wars, then the 1990's renewed liberation from dictators post Soviet demise. The ANC would like everyone to believe that they were the only force driving the change but that is untrue. FW de Klerk's end-Apartheid speech and the fall of the Berlin Wall both took place in 1989 after the Soviet threat had essentially disappeared. In the light of this, the existance of the SACP and the ANC's continuous alliance with them seems particularly strange. In fact, if the SACP would stand independently they would not get one single seat in parliament. COSATU, on their own, would be smaller that the DA. The two-thirds majority has eluded the Alliance in the past and now it will never happen, considering the tears in the alliance fabric they so desperately want to hide.
mourning democracy 12/20/2009 9:44 AM
viva mandela, you are sucking figures out of your thumb and then you dare call others idiots. The whites sent several delegations into Africa over many decades to negotiate a constitutional settlement with the ANC, but they were all sent back with a 'all whites leave Africa' position - until the USSR collapsed in 1989 and the ANC's funding dried up. Within a year they agreed to a constitution that is still in place today and Mandela was released, and the president 3 years later. You claim that 873 000 black children died on June 16th. Are you crazy? It's public record that less than 600 people died (not that it is less of a tragedy but openly lying about that is a reflection on your honesty. Shame on you.) Dr. Melville Edelstein worked his entire life for the welfare of those kids and they stoned him to death and put a sign on his corpse "Beware Afrikaners". It's a clear sign of race-hatred, which is still bogging the country down today, not against whites only, but their own countrymen. Liberty for the people is a very hollow word today; the elite just shifted from one race group to another, more fierce and vicious. If the ANC agreed to a constitution in 1987 or even earlier, how much grief and how many lives would have been spared? They didn't care then, and they don't care now. The SA constitution is still a thorn in the side of the ANC but they just cannot garner sufficient votes to overturn it. The scandals of corruption and self-enrichment that rocked the current government will be its undoing. You will probably lie about that, too.
Andy 12/20/2009 9:11 AM
'Viva Mandela' - pleas get your facts straight before your critisize others. Do some research on June 16. "The official death toll was 23; others put it as high as 200. Many hundreds of people were injured". Where the hell do you get 873000 deaths??
viva mandela 12/20/2009 6:05 AM
you GDS you really are an idiot and i dont think you have seen the movie, this explains how mandela wanted to unite the country and he used rugby as a white dominated sport to bring both blacks and whites together and you should say thanks to him because if it was not for him South Africa would have never participated in international events due to the apartheid policies that were causing sanctions against this beautiful country of ours. the other thing that you should do is to have your facts right before uttering any nonsense...you say 295 000 have died since Mr Mandela was released and thats have been 19 years, what about 873 000 black children that died on 16 June 1976?
GDS 12/20/2009 1:01 AM
It was a great game of rugby, Mandela had nothing to do with it; just political spin that failed. RIP to the 295 000 that have been murdered since Mandela was set free.
DN 12/19/2009 11:41 PM
Mckyle, Mandela wasn't released in 1994.
Mckyle Seneca 12/18/2009 6:00 PM
In do not remember the 1995 Rugby game though I remember vividly the 1994 Mandala release. It was noon in Ghana and I was in Middle school last semester. As a film enthusiast I hope to someday direct in Africa as well. Maybe my calling is not statesmanship but helping people realize Africa through the lens.
Your Name
Email
Comment
Please enter the text below
Captcha