MAMAs 2016: The winners of the annual MTV Africa Music Awards were announced during a glitzy ceremony

Meet Iain Thomas, the 36-year-old South African poet who is famous all over the world except in SA


2006-03-30 12:59


Adam, a for-hire photographer, and Dr Lawrence Gordon, wake up to find themselves chained by the leg to the pipes at opposite ends of a public toilet, armed only with hacksaws. They figure out they're being held captive by a serial torturer who forces his victims to kill themselves, or to kill one another to save themselves. A taped message informs Dr Gordon that his must murder his cellmate by 6pm, or his kidnapped wife and child will die.


"Saw" is the kind of empty torture-porn movie that should be impossible to swallow - but isn't. People do terribly cruel things, unnecessarily, all the time. It didn't feel all that different to watching the bombing of Baghdad, or seeing photos of the torture at Abu Ghraib.

Despite the fact that we should be used to witnessing such evils, "Saw" is still revoltingly scary. Why? Not only because it's gory, but also because its success shows that we are getting used to the idea that terrible cruelty and moral authority can be partners.

Ah it's just fun, it's just a movie, people say.

Well yes, you could laugh the whole way through it. Or you could worry that filmmakers are pushing the boundaries to the point where mainstream films are beginning to resemble atrocities like the pornographic cult movie, "Cannibal Holocaust". "Saw" embraces the idea that all is fair in love, war, pornography and horror.

All the victims in Saw appear unlikeable and weak as if to justify the moral authority of their torturer. In their stupidity, their selfishness and their sinfulness, they seem to earn their hellish torture. Each time they make a mistake, or in any way breach the family values system, they are punished completely out of proportion to their crimes.

In Saw's world, the divine power to judge and punish has become the domain of mere humans. Characters are pornographically humiliated without the sick sense of fun that Tarantino relies on in "Reservoir Dogs", or the human appeal of David Fincher and Andrew Kevin Walker's "Se7en".

Horror is, and always has been about Europeans and Americans exploring their worst fears en mass and so it reflects the nature of society at the time. When teen sex was taboo but happening, the monsters always killed the slutty girls first ("Spam in a Cabin"). When we feared mass movements and mob violence, horrors showed us being attacked by hordes of mindless zombies ("Night of the Living Dead"). When we became aware of the power of other cultures, it was Native American graveyards ("Pet Cemetery"). And now we fear cruel dictators, and the threat they pose to our families and our freedom. That's why "Saw" suits the world of 2005 so well. In it, a serial killer toys with his victims, much as a torturer serving an evil regime would with his helpless prisoners.

But despite the film's relevance, in the end, it's not very good. The acting is often amateurish (the words "Made for TV" spring to mind). The stars are all big names but they do nothing more than trundle out stock action movie characters - the flawed but doting father, the cop driven mad by an unsolved case... etc. The result is that the movie's creators exploit serious themes without having the courage to develop convincing characters, and really deal with issues sympathetically, or make meaning of the horror. In fact, I suspect that the filmmakers weren't even aware of what they were saying.

So, see Saw, but beware of taking it too lightly. Sure, it has all the marks of a typical popcorn thriller. Sure, the obligatory twist in the tale ending is the subject of flame wars and plot related debates on movie message boards. But because torture, death, misery and gore are not "just good fun", it leaves you feeling only half woken from a very bad dream when it ends.

- Jean Barker

Exploitation cinema meets Art. It's a sign of the times.

Jack Reacher: Never Go Back

2016-10-14 07:38

jason 2005-03-31 09:33 AM
saw awsum!!!!!!!! yes
James 2005-03-31 05:50 PM
Something pulls me in towards SAW I have not seen the movie, but have read about it in a couple of reviews, and for some reason every review seems so different to the other. What attracts me to the film is the fact that it was an idea of a film-school graduate and is so different to what we are used to in thrillers. Not that I enjoy thrillers, to be honest I see no point, there are a million ways of being thrilled and firghtened and have a racing heart once it's all over! For some reason I just have what may be described as a fatal attraction to this production. Who knows, maybe it's worth seeing for the sole reason of creativity (Besides of course the predictability of the screen writing described by Jean) Thanks for the review! I agree 100% with all you said! The Incredibles (Best of all time!!! Maybe Toy Story)
Maryam 2005-04-01 06:28 PM
gettin u grippin ur seat I have to admit, at first i thought "this is a wierd movie" but the more i watched it, the more i was pulled into the movie. I was both thrilled and scared at the same time and movies dont ususally do that to me nymore. I was literally left sitting speachless with my mouth wide open at the end. I would definately recommend this movie to anybody who loves a thriller / suspense. sixth sense, the others
Omar 2005-04-01 06:41 PM
Twisty I enjoyed it. Stay glued till the end. Reminded me alot of The Usual Suspects. Not on the same magnitude but will leave you thinking at the end- trying to tie up all the loose ends. Watch it but be warned- you'll either love it or hate it.... The Usual Suspects-6th sense
Kirst 2005-04-01 08:18 PM
Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events Amazing Spooky Disturbed Magnificent
Mo 2005-04-11 04:20 PM
Very Good Wow. what a movie. Thought it was really exciting from start to finish. very good. very good story, and will be part of my DVD collection very soon
Mindlo 2008-02-06 08:57 PM
Its good entertainment I saw the movie on a lazy December day about two months before the second one came out. The fact that the movie had little hype (compared to the other sequels) expectation were low but it did extertain and thrill. Basically, it did its job. Its not as bloody as its sequels, which is a good thing and it does get the point across. Despite of the B- grade movie feel mixed with Dean Carr music video imagery, its agood picture and the best all the parts...

Recent Reviews

Jack Reacher: Never Go Back

2016-10-14 07:38

Just another typical Tom Cruise action film, with nothing to get too excited about. The film is loaded with action-film stereotypes and cheesy one-liners. Read More »
Add your review

Hands of Stone

2016-10-14 07:38

Hands of Stone is a bland, unlikable portrayal of a real-life boxer that struggles to hit the highs of Rocky IV let alone Raging Bull or the original Rocky. Mark this one down as “for boxing fanatics only”. Read More »
Add your review

There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.