In partnership with

Jury hears closing arguments in the Blurred Lines case

2015-03-06 19:00
 

Los Angeles - Singers Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams lied about how they crafted the 2013 hit Blurred Lines and should be financially punished for using music by Marvin Gaye, a lawyer for the late singer's family told a jury Thursday.

An attorney for Williams and Thicke, however, said his clients did nothing wrong in evoking the feeling of Gaye's music, and determining they improperly copied his work would have a chilling effect on musicians and other artists.

Tweet it. Instagram it. Vine it. Get those votes in. #votethicke

A photo posted by Robin Thicke (@robinthicke) on

The duelling portrayals of deceit and creative expression emerged during closing arguments in the copyright infringement case filed by Gaye's children against the contemporary hit-makers.

Lawyer Richard Busch, who represents Gaye's children, accused Williams and Thicke of repeatedly changing their stories about how they created Blurred Lines. He urged the jury to find that the song infringed on the copyright for his 1977 hit Got to Give It Up.

#VMA's in 5 days. Instagram it... #VoteThicke

A photo posted by Robin Thicke (@robinthicke) on

Busch told the eight-person panel that they could award millions of dollars to the heirs of the deceased singer.

"When you do something wrong and you lie about it, there are consequences," Busch said during his closing argument.

Howard King, lead attorney for Williams, Thicke and rapper T.I., told jurors a verdict for the Gaye family would stifle artists and inhibit musicians trying to recreate an era or genre of music. Williams has said that was his intent with Blurred Lines.

Today is the last day to #VoteBlurredLines at the #VMAS for #BestCollab #VideoOfTheYear & #BestMaleVideo.

A photo posted by Robin Thicke (@robinthicke) on

"This is more important than money," King said.

Blurred Lines was the biggest hit of 2013 and was nominated for a Grammy Award. T.I.'s rap track was added after it was recorded in mid-2012. He did not testify at the trial that started Feb. 24.

The jury began deliberations on Thursday and will resume on Friday.

24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
1 comment
Comments have been closed for this article.
NEXT ON CHANNELX
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.