In the event that the classification committee had jurisdiction, it was required to afford a hearing in some form to other publishers of the image. "We submit that the appeal must be upheld on the basis that the decision of the classification committee was incorrect on its merits."Treatment of evidence The committee erred in its treatment of the evidence before it, including in relation to what it considered to be "common cause". It relied on the concerns of "sensitive adults" when it had no jurisdiction to do so. The lawyers said the committee failed to recognise that the portrait did not in any event infringe on any person's right to have his or her dignity respected.
24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.
We get in the mood for the Savanna CCA’s with a Deep Fried Man quickie! Read More »
Durban writer Zainub Priya Dala says she wants to get out of the psychiatric hospital she checked herself into after being recognised. Read More »
Blues meets Rock!
South AfricaR600 000 Per Year
South AfricaHomeMarkR15 000 - R20 000 Per Month
HousesR 3 350 000
HousesR 15 590 000
HousesR 2 900 000