In the event that the classification committee had jurisdiction, it was required to afford a hearing in some form to other publishers of the image. "We submit that the appeal must be upheld on the basis that the decision of the classification committee was incorrect on its merits."Treatment of evidence The committee erred in its treatment of the evidence before it, including in relation to what it considered to be "common cause". It relied on the concerns of "sensitive adults" when it had no jurisdiction to do so. The lawyers said the committee failed to recognise that the portrait did not in any event infringe on any person's right to have his or her dignity respected.
24.com publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.
Self-confessed Queen of Hating Exercise Grethe Koen decided she would give South Africa’s first ever trampoline fitness park a go. And she didn’t hate it Read More »
Justus Visagie advises the new Honda HR-V appears youthful and streamlined, and should appeal to a younger audience Read More »
A coffee snob.
A new beer.
Welcome in SA.
GautengSanlamR10 000 - R50 000 Per Month
NelspruitDante Personnel RecruitmentR4 500 - R6 500 Per Month
GautengRed Pebble RecruitmentR50 000 - R70 000 Per Month
HousesR 17 900 000
HousesR 7 750 000
HousesR 2 850 000