We will publish nude pics of Kate, says mag

2012-09-14 07:36
Paris - A French magazine claims it will publish topless pictures of Prince William's wife Catherine on Friday, apparently taken while the British royal couple were on holiday in France last week.

Announcing a world exclusive, Closer magazine invited readers, via its website, to pick up the new edition and enjoy "the photos that the world can't wait to see; the Duchess of Cambridge topless on a guesthouse terrace".

The story was picked up in the British media on Friday ahead of what would be another embarrassing revelation for the Royal family shortly after a British tabloid published naked pictures of William's brother Harry.

The royal couple are currently in Malaysia where Catherine made her first public comments on foreign soil on Thursday during an Asia-Pacific tour.


  • gavin786 - 2012-09-14 08:08

    Why? What for? Krikey - never an end to this bullsh$t. Just let them be!

      charles.stjthomson - 2012-09-14 08:23

      I wonder if they'll send William to Afghanistan too...

      preshen.govender.90 - 2012-09-14 16:07

      Boobs are like master card accepted everywhere

      rentiadiedericks - 2012-09-15 07:46

      It's not about the boobs! Here's the photo they want to hide! Prince Charles blew his chances to become King when he was caught naked in France too, btw http://praag.org/?p=1600

  • Don.Tandy - 2012-09-14 08:14

    Yet another example of what a bunch of sleazebags the media are - print anything to try and sell their usual brand of bulls**t.

      koo.doyle - 2012-09-14 08:21

      Who's worse, the media who produce their usual brand of bull or the people who flock to buy it?

      robert.m.sylvester - 2012-09-14 09:12

      Perhaps everyone could boycott those particular papers.

      Don.Tandy - 2012-09-14 15:44

      @koo- good point - I would rate them equally sleazy.

      rodney.bevan.58 - 2012-09-14 23:35

      At least the couple have sued the french mag for invasion of privacy. I hope the magazine goes bust. sick swine didn't learn from the Princess Di episode, maybe they will from this.

  • jan.calitz1 - 2012-09-14 08:15

    I honestly think it will be stupid to publish her royal titties! Respect a bit of privacy!There should be laws against these peeping toms!

      steve.gibson.146612 - 2012-09-14 14:33

      If she objects to their publication she should not go topless. If she does she must expect and accept the following flak. Simple as that.

      rodney.louis.7 - 2012-09-15 07:13

      celebs know a nude pic here and there keeps you in the headlines..these ppl deliberately leaks the pics themselves

  • darryl.maze1 - 2012-09-14 08:25

    These paparazi are pathetic and perverts. Let them have there privacy. Guess you paparazzi dont get alot of action at home so you gotta go take topless pics to help u. They must make stronger laws against vultures.

  • reine.marais - 2012-09-14 08:36

    The media concerned should be sued for invasion of privacy, both in the context of Harry and in this context. It is one thing to take embarrassing pictures of people who are embarrassing themselves in public. It is another, entirely, to spy through windows and peek into gardens and onto balconies. The photographers who took these pictures should be ashamed of themselves.

  • sekalf.nroc - 2012-09-14 08:38

    ya right, that is going to happen

  • caelykins.zanna - 2012-09-14 08:53

    Idiots. It is not as if she was flaunting in public. Allow her some privacy. The media are worse than our traffic cops hiding behind bushes all day.

      robert.m.sylvester - 2012-09-14 09:16

      Nobody is worse than our lazy sneaky traffic cops...............

  • raymond.billson - 2012-09-14 09:10

    anything to sell a newspaper and degrade an individual. How about publishing uplifting and the promotion of positive incidences so that people may have role models that promote the good things of society.

  • Harold Chisimba - 2012-09-14 09:13

    The f* **g mag .must be sued if it publishes the nude pic. without her consent.Why can't they respect her privancy? There so many notorious damsels like Paris, Who can enjoy that immorality and indecency.Sorry world can't wait for you to change your moronic and mischievious decision. GTH!

  • liza.bourdelle - 2012-09-14 09:34

    The photos were taken at a private location - the photographer is no different than a heavy breathing pervert or peeping tom sneaking around taking pictures of what thousands of women do when they are on holiday.

  • george.pito - 2012-09-14 09:59

    No publish it how long must we wait. She obviously showed them to be published

  • john.fourie.18 - 2012-09-14 10:00

    The French don't like English Princesses, hey.

  • beefybalfe - 2012-09-14 11:46

    what did she expect that her life would be all fine and dandy and the only pictures that get printed are the one's that she looks OK in she married a royal sorry kate comes with the territory......

      riette.nothling - 2012-09-14 12:47

      no it doesn't, she has the right to her privacy, sneaking around for pics like this taken in a private setting has no business being published, or even existing for that matter.

  • john.chiwaya.77 - 2012-09-14 11:57

    Let people feel free of wat they wana do or theey r doing.life's to shot ok.

      jpanagidis - 2012-09-14 18:47

      Perhaps an English class or 200 would be in order before posting anything online Mr. Chiwaya?

  • john.chiwaya.77 - 2012-09-14 12:03

    Doenst mean being a celeb,people the mst b ensecure of doing wat eva the wana do no.

      yolande.rwaai - 2012-09-14 12:34

      Say what now?! *confused*

      brenton.tyrrell - 2012-09-14 22:32

      John, seriously...For now you should consider lurking, not contributing. Baby steps, brother.

  • mfundoj1 - 2012-09-14 13:43

    Royal boobs!!! =P\r\nI wanna see them =P

  • daniel.w.gie - 2012-09-14 13:53

    Catherine ......You have the admiration of millions ....It's not easy being who you are .....be strong .

  • humphrey.bogartzo - 2012-09-14 13:55

    yeh we want to see them,what so special and different abt their nudity.

  • rose.mcmillan - 2012-09-14 14:40

    Why don't you leave the people alone, you disgust me, why not print topless pictures of your wives or girlfriends, I'm sure they would like to see themselves in you magazine.

  • beverly.young3 - 2012-09-14 17:34

    Oh for heavens sake, leave the poor woman alone. Yes she shouldnt havent have etc, but she was not in public.....eish

  • beverly.young3 - 2012-09-14 17:42

    Listen at least it was only Kate.....imagine the rest of the bunch nude... Camilla??? lordy

      rodney.louis.7 - 2012-09-15 07:17

      camilla's poops lol .. those wont even make the swop column

  • fawzia.bayat - 2012-09-14 21:41

    Totally agree , the perverse media should shelf the idea of publishing the pics.

  • lionel.defrontignac - 2012-09-15 06:12


  • beryl.knipe - 2012-09-15 07:59

    I agree with Gavin. Why? What satisfaction will ANYONE get from seeing nude pictures of Catherine? You pressman in Paris or wherever the H you are DISGUSTING leeches!! There's enough nudity and pornography going around to satisfy all the "sick" people who thrive on it! Leave this woman ALONE! She was with her HUSBAND and not frolicking in the bloody hay with the gardener!

  • elspeth.hassall - 2012-09-15 13:51

    Very sad to see "The Independant on Saturday" has published these pics on their front page...I guess the rest of the SA press will follow suite... also some of our magazines...what's with these people?

  • pages:
  • 1