Lawyer: Jackson died from own bad choices

2013-09-26 09:35
michael jackson
Los Angeles - Michael Jackson died because of his own bad choices involving the drug that killed him and the doctor who provided it, not because of anything done by AEG Live, a lawyer for the producer of Jackson's comeback concerts told jurors on Wednesday.

Delivering his closing argument in the long-running negligence case by Jackson's family, defence attorney Marvin Putnam said the secretive singer never told the producers that he was using the hospital anaesthetic propofol to overcome his chronic insomnia.

If AEG Live had known, it would have pulled the plug on the planned tour, the lawyer said.

"AEG would have never agreed to finance this tour if they knew Mr Jackson was playing Russian roulette in his bedroom every night," Putnam told jurors.

'Wouldn't take no for an answer'

Putnam also said AEG Live LLC tried to deter Jackson from hiring Dr Conrad Murray, who was later found guilty of involuntary manslaughter in his death, but Jackson "wouldn't take no for an answer".

Only after Jackson's death, he said, did the company learn about the secret propofol treatments by Murray.

"AEG only learned the truth after Mr Jackson passed," Putnam said. "They heard for the first time what propofol was."

Putnam stressed that it was Jackson, not AEG, who insisted on hiring Murray, a cardiologist who had befriended the pop star in Las Vegas three years earlier. Jackson, who was using him as a family doctor, told AEG that Murray was to be his physician for the This Is It shows in London, according to Putnam.

"He didn't ask AEG," the lawyer said. "He said, 'We're using this doctor.' He was a grown man of 50 and as a grown man he is responsible for his own health and his own choices no matter how bad those choices may be."

AEG told Jackson there were great doctors in London but the singer would not be deterred, Putnam said.

"It was his money and he certainly wasn't going to take no for an answer," he said.

'He caused the death of Michael Jackson'

Murray was convicted in 2011 after giving Jackson an overdose of propofol on the day he died in 2009.
The drug is not meant to be used outside operating rooms.

With Michael Jackson's mother, Katherine, a plaintiff in the suit, seated in a front row, Putnam reminded jurors that she said she wanted to know the truth about her son's demise. But she also testified that she closed her ears when she heard bad things about him, he said.

He accused lawyers for the Jackson family of asking jurors to close their ears to facts surrounding the actions of the singer.

"He made some bad choices that resulted in a horrible tragedy. You can't blame someone else for his bad choices," Putnam said.

A day earlier, a lawyer for Katherine Jackson had portrayed AEG Live executives and Murray as mercenaries who sacrificed the pop star's life in a quest to boost their own fortunes.

Attorney Brian Panish said a $150 000-a-month contract to care for Jackson on tour was a lifeline to help Murray climb out of his financial troubles. He blamed AEG executives for failing to realise Murray was unfit for the job.

"Obviously, he was incompetent and unfit," Panish said. "He caused the death of Michael Jackson."

Videos of the superstar's life

The courtroom atmosphere was starkly changed on Wednesday. Panish had brought Hollywood dazzle, showing professionally produced videos of the superstar's life and home movies of him with his children when they were babies.

Putnam, however, focused his argument solely on the law and the evidence jurors had seen during the five-month trial. He showed e-mails and excerpts from proposed contracts, arguing that there never was a contract between Murray and AEG.

A key issue in the negligence suit is whether AEG Live or Michael Jackson hired Murray.

AEG Live drafted a contract for Murray's services, according to testimony, but it was only signed by Murray. Still, Panish said, the contract was valid because it was the result of oral negotiations with Murray.

Putnam said if jurors find AEG didn't do the hiring, their work will be done and they need not decide other questions involving damages.

Panish will get a chance on Thursday to rebut Putnam's argument before the case is submitted to jurors. A unanimous verdict is not required in the case. Only nine of the 12 jurors must agree. publishes all comments posted on articles provided that they adhere to our Comments Policy. Should you wish to report a comment for editorial review, please do so by clicking the 'Report Comment' button to the right of each comment.

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.
There are new stories on the homepage. Click here to see them.